The Difference Between Smoke Testing and Sanity Testing

Smoke Test Vs Sanity Test:

Smoke Testing can be used to verify that the program's acute functions are functioning properly. It can also be called subset acceptance testing. It's used to test all functions of the system/product. Sanity Testing on the contrary is used to ensure that the build has been completed without any bugs. This is also a known subset of regression testing.

It is easy to confuse smoke testing with sanity tests. Although these two types of testing are identical, each has its own objectives and priorities. We will now explain the differences between smoke testing and sanity testing.

What is Software Build?

You can create a simple program by compiling and linking one file. This process is extremely simple.

This is usually not the case. Software Projects typically have hundreds of thousands or more of source code files. This makes it difficult and time-consuming work to create executable programs from the source files.

To create executable software, you will need to use "build" software. This is also known as "Software Build".

Smoke Testing:

Smoke Testing, a software testing method used to confirm that critical functionality of the software is working properly after the software has been developed, is called software testing. It is performed before any regression or functional tests are run. Smoke testing is used to reject software applications that have defects. This allows the QA team not to waste time testing such software.


Smoke Testing focuses on the most crucial functionality or component of a system. The goal is not to test everything, but to ensure that the most critical functions of the system work well.

One example of a smoke test is: Verify that your application launches successfully. Check that the GUI works well.

What is Sanity Testing?

Software Testing is also known as Sanity Testing. It's performed after receiving software builds with minor modifications in code or functionality. The goal of this type of testing is to verify that all bugs have been addressed and that no new issues have been introduced by these changes. The objective is to ensure that the proposed functionality works as expected. The build will be rejected if it fails to pass the sanity testing. This saves time and costs associated with more thorough testing.


The objective of this exercise is "not" verifying the new functionality thoroughly, but rather to establish that the developer applied some rationality (sanity) when creating the software. For example, suppose your scientific calculator calculates 2 + 2 = 5. The advanced functionalities, such as sin 30+ cos 50, are not worthwhile. Let's make the comparison between smoke testing vs sanity testing.

Smoke Testing vs Sanity Testing:


Note: This content is originally published by https://medium.com/@govindbqurious/whats-the-difference-between-smoke-testing-and-sanity-testing-c1d1485dda36

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Automation Testing? Complete Guide Here

Image
Automation testing is a process where you write a script that can be used to automate many of the tests you would normally run manually. Automation testing reduces the need to program your site or script from scratch, saves time, and makes it easier to find bugs in your code. The lack of coding is important because having to code well will make you think about features and solutions in ways that make it harder for you to spot issues. automated mobile testing Automating Mobile App Testing mobile app testing Automated Mobile Testing Tool automated mobile testing Automating Mobile App Testing mobile app testing Automated Mobile Testing Tool automated mobile testing Automating Mobile App Testing mobile app testing Automated Mobile Testing Tool automated mobile testing Automating Mobile App Testing mobile app testing automated regression testing what is regression testing regression test regression testing definition regression testing meaning regression tests Salesforc
Read more

5 Tips and Best Practices for Automated Testing

Image
In this digital age test automation is demanded more than ever before. It is vital to the development of a software application or product. A rigid single approach is not smart. Teams must be flexible enough to change strategies in accordance with the requirements. But, there are some best practices that can yield positive results, regardless of the scenario. Following the latest test automation best practices will help you maximize your ROI by reducing development times by reducing repetitive, time-consuming tasks, and enhancing the quality of your software. Automated Testing Best Practices to Follow: 1. Decide the Test Cases If you do are able to automate testing, do not implement it across all tests. Find out what tests you are able to automate while relying on tests that are manual for other cases. Here's how you can do this. Test cases that don't require repeated testing can be performed by hand. Automate testing for cases that are lengthy complex and require frequent tes
Read more

How to Calculate ROI in Automation Testing?

Image
ROI Calculator For Test Automation: ROI, which is also known as the returns on investments, is a metric to determine the effectiveness of an investment. In this instance, we'll talk about the automation of tests. At the moment the competition is becoming stronger. To remain competitive numerous businesses are trying to get the job done in less time and expense. This goal can be achieved through the automation of test scenarios. Although automation testing will incur a higher than the initial investment, the expense will decrease as the process develops. ROI test automation or Automation testing offers a number many advantages over manually testing. It's not essential in order to completely automate the process. Automation testing is helpful to test regression scenarios. This is due to the fact that when performing regression testing testers must be working with large datasets. Automated testing ROI assists in determining whether the switch to automation is worthwhile. Think ab
Read more